India–EU Trade Deal Explained (2026): Benefits, Risks, and India’s Concerns
The India–EU Trade Deal signed in 2026 is being described as one of the largest free trade agreements in the world. While the government highlights export growth and strategic partnership with Europe, critics warn about risks to Indian manufacturing, MSMEs, and long-term economic independence. This article explains what the India–EU trade agreement is, its benefits, and the concerns surrounding it.
History does not always repeat itself in the same form. Sometimes it returns wearing a suit, carrying legal documents instead of cannons, and calling itself “free trade”.
The recently announced India–European Union Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is being projected as a historic economic milestone. But beneath the celebratory language lies a deeply troubling possibility: India may once again be positioned primarily as a consumer market rather than a producer, echoing the colonial trade structure of the East India Company era.
This article presents a data-driven, structural critique of the deal — not emotional rhetoric, not political propaganda — but a sober economic warning.
1. Free Trade Between Unequals Is Not Friendship
Trade works best when both sides possess comparable industrial, technological, and institutional strength. When they do not, trade becomes extraction.
The European Union:
- Centuries-old industrial ecosystems
- Spends 2–3% of GDP on R&D
- Dominates advanced manufacturing, food processing, precision engineering, and branding
India:
- Vast raw materials, manpower, and market
- Limited ownership of core industrial technologies
- Spends only ~0.7% of GDP on R&D
- Depends heavily on imported machinery and components
Friendship between unequals is never neutral. The weaker side always pays the price.
2. India Has Resources — But Lacks Technology Ownership
India is not poor in fundamentals.
- Iron ore, coal, bauxite, rare earth potential
- Fertile agricultural land and water systems
- The world’s largest youth manpower pool
India mainly lacks:
- Petroleum (manageable through diversification)
- Indigenous high-end technology
Despite decades of effort:
- No globally competitive semiconductor manufacturing
- No mass-market Indian electronics brand with strong IP
- Heavy dependence on imported high-value components
Opening markets without mastering technology locks a nation permanently into low-value roles.
3. Processed Food & FMCG: The Silent Collapse Risk
One of the most dangerous aspects of the deal is the opening of processed food and FMCG sectors.
European companies:
- Operate at massive scale
- Receive heavy agricultural subsidies
- Possess superior packaging and logistics
- Enjoy strong “European quality” perception
Indian FMCG producers:
- Mostly MSMEs
- High logistics and compliance costs
- Limited branding and R&D support
As tariffs fall, cheaper imports will undercut domestic brands. This is exactly how colonial trade destroyed Indian handicrafts — slowly, structurally, and permanently.
4. Agriculture & Dairy: A Delayed Shock
India’s dairy sector supports over 80 million farmers.
Even partial opening is risky because:
- European dairy is heavily subsidized
- Production costs are artificially low
- Urban consumers favor imported brands
Even if raw milk remains protected, processed dairy products will enter first, creating pressure that eventually reaches rural producers.
5. Cheaper Imports Kill Self-Development Incentives
When imports become cheaper:
- Domestic R&D becomes unattractive
- Entrepreneurs shift from manufacturing to trading
- Governments delay hard industrial reforms
Examples already exist:
- Over 40 years of effort on indigenous jet engines without full success
- ECIL and BEL exist, yet India imports most electronic components<
Comments
Post a Comment