How Independent India was ruled by the Powers of the world, and never in reality our governments were never ours

1. Partition and Humanitarian Crisis: The partition of India was a major setback, resulting in a significant humanitarian crisis. India faced one of the largest migrations in history, with an estimated 14 million people displaced, according to UNHCR estimates.
   

2. British Role: The proposal for the partition of India, despite opposition from Mahatma Gandhi and the Congress, reflected England's disregard for the welfare of the Indian people. It was perceived as a clear manifestation of their intention to rule the country by keeping it weak. The partition was strategically engineered to weaken India economically and politically, serving British interests. For instance, the inclusion of Sindh in Pakistan, despite being a Hindu-majority region adjacent to Mumbai and Gujarat, and the North West Frontier Province, also a Hindu-majority area, show the flawed decisions. If West Pakistan could be created in the midst of India, far away from East Pakistan, then the North West Frontier Province could have been made part of India. This made the Hindu population suffer and hindered its development. Post-independence, India's economy relied heavily on British investments in industrial sectors catering to Western demand. For the common man, independence brought little tangible change, as the transition was largely symbolic. The economic policies continued for several years after independence, profiting the West. The first example can be seen from Britain's unsupportive stance during the jeep procurement for the Indian army. The procurement of jeeps for the Indian army marked India's first major corruption scandal, revealing instances of bribery and corruption involving bureaucrats developed under British rule. Even after the payment of advance, only around 150 jeeps were delivered out of the 1,500 ordered. Western Influence: The West created a narrative of progressing minorities, particularly Muslims, in India. They created special rights for them in the name of democracy and human rights, while racial discrimination was at its peak in their own countries. The Congress followed this tradition, resulting in the suppression of the majority population, recognizing the role of the Muslim vote in maintaining power. Congress faced challenges as a Hindu political party due to large-scale violence against Hindus during events like Direct Action Day and incidents like the Noakhali riots. This contributed to the rise of the Hindutva movement and led to changes in Congress's approach towards Muslims, often submitting to their demands at the cost of the majority population of India. The West propagated the narrative that democratic values could be upheld only by promoting Muslims, while Sikhs, who had always fought for Hindus and India, were suppressed. Assassination of Lal Bahadur Shastri: Whenever a great leader opposed Western interests, they were simply eradicated. One example is our great leader Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri. He initiated developmental efforts in India and died under suspicious circumstances in Tashkent after succeeding Nehru as Prime Minister. His death remains controversial, with lingering questions about whether it was an assassination. Post-independence, India struggled with a lack of leaders with strong personalities, hindering effective governance and decision-making. Then, after some time, Indira Gandhi became the Prime Minister. She was a good learner and soon realized the Western bully and started working for India's development. She was a clever leader and somehow kept a balance with the Western countries. She was also assassinated, and again India was led by leaders not strong enough to bring positive change to the country. Next came Rajiv Gandhi. Initially, he was not interested in politics but soon became a leader who tried to modernize the Indian economy. He was also assassinated. Even before the assassination of Indira Gandhi, her son Sanjay Gandhi died in a plane crash. He was a very strong leader and had completely taken control of the Indian Congress. His death raised many questions. Italian Rule: After the death of Rajiv Gandhi, Congress was taken over by Sonia Gandhi, his wife. This was a major downturn for India, as it was literally in the hands of foreign rule. During this era, it was clear that the government was meant for making scams, and unchecked looting of India took place like never before. Upon winning the election, she made Manmohan Singh the Prime Minister, who was just an employee of Sonia Gandhi. Foreign Influence and Economic Environment: India faced challenges due to foreign pressure, including the imposition of licenses and unfavorable economic conditions inhibiting industrial growth. Famine of 1970: India experienced a severe famine in 1970, underscoring issues related to food security and agricultural policies. Legal and Constitutional Framework: The Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Constitution of India played crucial roles in shaping the legal and governance structures of post-independence India. These rules were made during British rule and continue to this day. Minority Appeasement and Suppression of Hinduism: There is a perception that minority appeasement policies and the marginalization of Hinduism have influenced India's socio-political landscape in the post-independence era, affecting concepts of self-respect and equality. The majority population was suppressed, which ultimately hindered the natural growth of the country as law and order deteriorated due to the "goonda raj" in major states. Today, Western countries do not wish for India to grow; they only need a market to dump their industrial goods and earn money to sustain their own economies. The world is once again in conflict, which will ultimately benefit European countries. They always try to disrupt good governments in third-world countries. This will soon become clear after the Indian elections, revealing how they rigged the outcome. Today, all social media is controlled by Western countries. They promote those who write against the current Modi government to reestablish a proxy government in India.