There is a misconception among those who have failed to gain popularity and build stature like Modi. Modi's rise from a humble tea seller to Prime Minister did not happen overnight; it was the result of hard work and experience gained from interacting with every stratum of society, particularly the majority of India—the poor and the common laborers of the lower middle class. His extensive experience has enabled him to lead the BJP to become the largest party in India.
In contrast, the Congress, led by Sonia Gandhi, who is a italian, lacks an understanding of the basic needs of the Indian people. Instead, she seems focused on maintaining her position as party leader solely due to her association with the Gandhi family. When they fail to deliver, they resort to cries of democracy. We have already witnessed the ten-year rule of what could be termed an "Italian government" in India, with Manmohan Singh as Prime Minister, who wasn't even elected by the people. If one truly comprehends democracy, how would they describe the era of Manmohan Singh, where the actual power rested with Sonia, a person of Italian origin?
Today, we have a Prime Minister who truly represents the Indian people.
Only a few can connect the dots and label Modi's strict actions against corrupt ministers, MPs, and MLAs as undemocratic. I urge those individuals to look at Manmohan era: were we truly living in independent India? If we were to tally the scams during that time, it would surpass the plunder witnessed during ten years of British colonial rule.
This is democracy—when you work for the betterment of your country, you must sometimes take strict actions and engage in political maneuvers to remain in power and serve the nation. This is precisely what Modi is doing—striving to retain power so that India can truly achieve greatness.
Comments
Post a Comment